


Practical markers of this silence are measurable and mundane: shorter meetings, longer dashboards, fewer narrative case notes, and a rising share of decisions recorded as “system recommendation accepted.” The silence is not an absence of speech, but the narrowing of what counts as worthy of attention.
Repair begins by restoring space and obligation for human sense-making. Requiring short narrative inputs before automated recommendations are executed. Mandates named human sign-off for high-impact decisions. Building routine ethnographic audits that surface lived harms beyond metrics. Creating protected time for teams to interrogate recommendations and overturn automated defaults. Making provenance visible: requiring dashboards to show data sources, model assumptions and decision chains.
These are not technical band-aids, they are institutional habits recalibrated to preserve civic judgement.
